Humber/Ontario Real Estate Course 3 Exam Practice

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the Humber/Ontario Real Estate Course 3 Exam. Study with challenging questions and detailed explanations to enhance your understanding. Get ready to excel in your exam!

Start Multiple Choice Practice Test
Start Flash Cards

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.

What action can a developer take if a regional municipal decision requires downsizing a subdivision to protect an adjacent area?

  1. Appeal to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal.

  2. Submit a petition to the upper tier municipality.

  3. Request intervention from the Provincial Planning Council.

  4. Hold a public referendum on the downsize requirement.

  5. Submit a complaint to the property owner's association.

  6. Send a letter to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing.

The correct answer is: Appeal to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal.

A developer facing a decision from a regional municipality that necessitates downsizing a subdivision in order to safeguard an adjacent area has the option to appeal to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT). This tribunal serves as an independent body that adjudicates disputes arising from land use planning and municipal decisions. By appealing to the LPAT, the developer can present their case and seek a review of the municipal decision, arguing that it may be unreasonable or not in alignment with good planning principles. This avenue is particularly relevant in the context of planning law, where developers have a legal right to challenge decisions that they believe impact their ability to develop land as originally intended. The appeal process allows for a thorough examination of the situation, taking into account community concerns, planning policies, and the developer's perspective, potentially leading to a revision or reversal of the municipal decision. Other options listed do not directly provide a formal method for contesting municipal decisions regarding planning approvals. For instance, a petition to the upper tier municipality, intervention requests, public referendums, complaints to property owner's associations, or communications with the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing do not have the same authoritative standing in land use matters as an appeal to the LPAT, which is specifically designed to resolve such disputes

More Questions Like This